On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:35 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller < dtel...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Accessing XPCOM in a worker will most likely break the garbage-collector > in novel and interesting ways, so I don't suggest heading in that > direction. > > I'd like to hear more information about that, For example, if I setting a finalize for each XPCOM instance Object(javascript), when the Object's is GCed, then I release the xpcom instance, is that would not break the garbage-collector? Or we have other problems about garbage-collector, I am interested in that. > > Cheers, > David > > On 03/01/16 17:24, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > So that we could be able to access xpcom in worker. > > And we could be able to implement thunderbird new msg protocol in pure > > javascript > > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Josh Matthews <j...@joshmatthews.net> > > wrote: > > > >> What is the motivation for this work? > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dev-platform mailing list > >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > >> > > > > > > > -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
