On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:39 PM, William Lachance <wlacha...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 2015-11-06 5:56 PM, Mark Finkle wrote: > >> I also think measuring build times, and other build related stats, would >> be >> useful. I'd like to see Mozilla capturing those stats for developer builds >> though. I'm less interested in build times for the automation. That data >> is >> already looked at by the automation team. >> > > Chris Manchester has volunteered to look into submitting build times in > automation to perfherder here: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1222549 > > I actually do think that perfherder has some advantages over the existing > grafana system, in that it has the capability of being sheriffed easily > down to the per-commit level by anyone (not just releng/ateam). > > We'll see I guess! The proof will be in bugs filed and fixed when > regressions occur. I really think developer build times are strongly > correlated with build times in automation, so my hope is that there will be > a trickle-down effect if this system proves useful. > Yes, I agree this is a better approach. Having the build system produce logs or artifacts than can be ingested by perfherder is a more flexible model than the one we're currently using. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
