The behavior here should be the same whether or not you're using
XrayWrappers: If you remove the parent, you'll end up with a detached
subtree. You can modify this subtree, but most of the operations (like
loading a web page in an iframe) will only matter when the page gets
reinserted into the document.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Manuel Reimer <manuel.rei...@gmx.de>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> maybe someone here can explain some details about the internals of Firefox
> to me.
>
> My addon "EmbedUpdater" replaces <object> and <embed> tags with an
> <iframe>, when possible and a known replacement exists. This helps to get
> rid of Flash.
>
> Currently I have some more or less ugly "error handling" code to catch the
> case, that, for example, several <object>'s are stacked like this:
>
> <object data="...">
>   <object data="...">
>     <object data="...">
>       <embed src="...">
>     </object>
>   </object>
> </object>
>
> The potential problem, I see here, is that I get a list of all objects
> first (getElementsByTagName) and then loop over them. So it may be possible
> that the first <object> in this tree is already gone and replaced if my
> code wants to handle the second one.
>
> I now removed my ugly "protection code" and it seems like it is impossible
> to produce any error in this case. It seems like it doesn't matter if the
> parent of one of the children is gone.
>
> So what I would like to know: In which state is my "XRay-object", I use to
> get data from a node in a website, if the parent is gone and so the node
> itself is no longer on the page? Do I have to handle this case somehow or
> is it save to just ignore this case?
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
> Manuel
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to