On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Anthony Ricaud <anth...@ricaud.me> wrote:
> Regarding "in progress|favorable|not favorable|no opinion", I think >> that we don't need to be opinionated about features we aren't >> implementing unless we have a firm commitment not to implement the >> feature. Here I'm thinking variously about ORTC and >> navigator.connect, which we could say bad things about now and end up >> implementing later if we aren't careful. Do we really want or need to >> use this list as a political tool? >> >> Developers want to know when something is coming foremost, and maybe >> if. I think that's all we need. >> > > I think there could be value in having a clear stance on our position but > maybe that can be provided through the description field. I have no > preference and will implement whatever the consensus is. FWIW, I've sent an intent to implement for the Streams API, but I won't be able to actually start work until Q4. I just listed that as "favorable" for now. Not sure if we need a clearer "we intend to implement this but just haven't been able to start yet" status. Thanks for putting this together! Ben _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
