On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Andrew Sutherland <asutherl...@asutherland.org> wrote: > > A) The JS concept of versions goes away, at least for web content and ES6 > features (in the next few weeks). This covers things like > https://bugzil.la/855665 on making let work without requiring JS 1.7.
I think this is the right solution. At least for 'let' and 'yield'. > B) Have DOM workers use some JS version other than DEFAULT. It seems like > there could be web-compat isues with JS1.7/JS1.8 in their entirety, but > perhaps a stop-gap version could be introduced. We definitely can't change the JS version for all workers. > C) Let DOM workers inherit the version of their calling context as proposed > in https://bugzil.la/1151739 so the version parameter is effectively > propagated. I'd rather do D. Explicit > implicit here I think. > D) Some other means of allowing explicit DOM worker versions to be > specified. I guess we could do a stop-gap where we enable passing a JS-version to the |new Worker| constructor. But has anyone reached out to the JS team and let them know that we really need let and yield in workers to see if A is an option? / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
