On Tuesday 2015-03-10 08:49 -0700, bo...@mozilla.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 2:38:43 PM UTC, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > Have you tested bumping the gcc min version here 
> > <http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/autoconf/toolchain.m4#104>
> >  
> > to see if there are any builders that still use gcc 4.6?
> 
> I haven't, no.
> I assume you mean by pushing to try.
> Here's a push in case the bugs don't exist in certain builds:
> https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=044e896fc6fa

I was looking at the log for a B2G Device Image build (I think it
was the one for Nexus 5-L) a few days (less than a week) ago, and it
was using gcc 4.8 for the target and gcc 4.6 for the host (assuming
I was reading the logs correctly).

I point this out because:

 (1) the device image build isn't in that try run, and

 (2) it's not clear to me that the compiler version checks check
     both the target and host compiler versions when cross-compiling

-David

-- 
π„ž   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄒   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to