On Wednesday 2015-01-07 12:19 +0100, Marco Zehe wrote:
> On 07.01.2015 06:09, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jet Villegas <jville...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >> The main downside I see is a potential "Mozilla removes features used by
> >> disabled people..." PR fiasco. I think we can avoid that with a better
> >> proposal that we do support.
> > Maybe Marco Zehe would be interested in removing it :-).
> 
> I actually am not. ;) The reason is not that I care about this feature.
> I honestly don't. But the noise that is to be expected from "interested
> parties" if we remove the feature is going to suck so much unnecessary
> energy that the cost calculation is clearly tilted towards just leaving
> it in.
> 
> Besides: It does give us a competitive advantage over other browsers in
> the academic space and whereever other space longdesc may be used, or
> start being used once it is officially sanctioned by the W3C. Remember
> in accessibility world, the W3C word weighs much more than some on this
> list might think.

It's been officially sanctioned by the W3C since 1998:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/struct/objects.html#adef-longdesc-IMG
and that hasn't led to useful content using it.

> We could have decided to support Apple's formal complaint to longdesc
> when they published it in August[1], but we didn't. I didn't care enough
> to waste energy on it, and those who now speak out against the feature
> didn't appear to care much back then, either. So TBL rejected Apple's
> complaint, and the extension moved to the state it is at now.

In hindsight, I probably should have supported it, but I didn't want
to get involved.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to