Yes, looks like it is! It’s not explicitly spelled out though - someone
searching for “initializer list”, say, won’t find it. At a minimum it seems
worth adding an explicit mention in the text.
- Seth
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Nicholas Nethercote <n.netherc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Seth Fowler <s...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> So I noticed that we don’t say anything about initializer list formatting in
>> our coding style guide. I’d like to propose that we standardize this
>> formatting:
>>
>> Foo::Foo(int aBar, char aBaz)
>> : mBar(aBar)
>> , mBaz(aBaz)
>> {
>> ….
>> }
>
> This is already present in the example at
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Classes:
>
> class MyClass
> : public X // when deriving from more than one class, put each on its own
> line
> , public Y
> {
> public:
> MyClass()
> : mVar(0)
> , mVar2(0)
> {
> ...
> }
> ...
> };
>
> Nick
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
