This will only be exposed to privileged and certified apps, right?
Other content that does createElement("webview") will simply get a
HTMLUnknownElement, right?

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) <kc...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Summary:
>  Currently we have <iframe mozbrowser> which has a bunch additional
>  functionality than simple <iframe> and is a top level browsing context
>  by itself. Having <webview> avoids overloading <iframe> and provides
>  clarity. We also think this is the right direction towards the
>  standardization of the browser-element.
>
>  For the story of <iframe mozbrowser> see
>  
> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/08/building-the-firefox-browser-for-firefox-os/
>
> Bug:
>  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738172
>
> Link to standard:
>  Currently no formal standard. Ben Francis has created a draft which
>  largely resembles the current mozbrowser API. Google and Microsoft both
>  have their <webview> implementation similar to this proposal.
>
>  http://benfrancis.github.io/webview/
>  https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Using_the_Browser_API
>  https://developer.chrome.com/apps/tags/webview
>  http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/windows/apps/dn301831.aspx
>
> Platform coverage:
>  Initially on Firefox OS
>
> Estimated or target release:
>  Firefox OS 2.4
>
> Preference behind which this will be implemented:
>  It will be behind a pref dom.enable_webview. The html5 parser should be
>  taught to treat the tag as HTMLUnknownElement when preffed off.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to