This will only be exposed to privileged and certified apps, right? Other content that does createElement("webview") will simply get a HTMLUnknownElement, right?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) <kc...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Summary: > Currently we have <iframe mozbrowser> which has a bunch additional > functionality than simple <iframe> and is a top level browsing context > by itself. Having <webview> avoids overloading <iframe> and provides > clarity. We also think this is the right direction towards the > standardization of the browser-element. > > For the story of <iframe mozbrowser> see > > https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/08/building-the-firefox-browser-for-firefox-os/ > > Bug: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738172 > > Link to standard: > Currently no formal standard. Ben Francis has created a draft which > largely resembles the current mozbrowser API. Google and Microsoft both > have their <webview> implementation similar to this proposal. > > http://benfrancis.github.io/webview/ > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Using_the_Browser_API > https://developer.chrome.com/apps/tags/webview > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/windows/apps/dn301831.aspx > > Platform coverage: > Initially on Firefox OS > > Estimated or target release: > Firefox OS 2.4 > > Preference behind which this will be implemented: > It will be behind a pref dom.enable_webview. The html5 parser should be > taught to treat the tag as HTMLUnknownElement when preffed off. > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform