I see. I'll try to write with a more end-to-end test framework then. Thank you.
Patrick On 10/3/14 9:59 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > > On 10/3/2014 9:46 AM, Patrick Wang wrote: >> The test I am writing is to test an implementation of WebRTC's TCP >> socket in content process. These codes are build on top of TCPSocket's >> IPDL in C++ and don't have IDL so it cannot be called directly from JS, >> and the tests for chrome process version are written with gtest. >> Therefore I am thinking of writing a similar one with gtest but run in >> content process. > > Does the unit of code you're testing include two processes communicating > via IPDL? If so, I think you're going to need something more than a C++ > unit test, and should probably focus your efforts on a more end-to-end > integration test. Setting up IPDL connections and all of the machinery > that goes with that doesn't sounds like something we should be trying in > low-level unit tests. > > --BDS > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
