Would it be wise to allow for "image-rendering: pixelated" that applies to any 
scale operation, and give us an option to add other operations (eg. 
"image-rendering: smooth" or "image-rendering: bilinear") later?

--Jet

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Holbert" <dholb...@mozilla.com>
To: "Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" 
<dba...@dbaron.org>, dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:27:12 AM
Subject: Re: Intent to implement: "image-rendering: pixelated" CSS      
property-value

On 09/24/2014 09:23 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> So, it's not required to behave exactly the same everywhere; it simply
> codifies an author's intent.  (OK, I suppose it *is* required to behave
> exactly the same everywhere in the case of "pixelated" & upscaling,
> since that requires a particular algorithm, to achieve a particular
> effect. But other than that, it's purely a hint.)

(And actually, even in the case of pixelated & upscaling, the spec just
requires "nearest-neighbor _or similar_".  So, [as it goes on to say],
the spec "does not dictate any particular scaling algorithm to be used.")
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to