Hi Ehsan, That is a good question and I didn't think about it.
> are URLs from version X+1 guaranteed to exist The requestSession() returns a promise then this promise will be rejected if that URL is not existed on remote UA. Also there is a discussion on webscreen mail list to check whether we can apply condition (ex: URL) then UA will filter out screens not support this URL. > work the same way on version X? This is really an issue and what I can imagine is 1. the X+1 should be backward compatible 2. or UA can filter out if the API version is different. Sincerely yours. ----- 原始郵件 ----- 寄件者: "Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> 收件者: "Marco Chen" <mc...@mozilla.com>, "Fabrice Desré" <fabr...@mozilla.com> 副本: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org 寄件備份: 2014 9 月 16 星期二 下午 11:01:36 主旨: Re: [PresentationAPI] Intend to implement Does this mean that now the URLs in certified gaia apps must be considered stable? i.e., if the dongle is running version X of gaia and the device is running version X+1, are URLs from version X+1 guaranteed to exist and work the same way on version X? Have gaia developers been notified about this? On 2014-09-16, 7:07 AM, Marco Chen wrote: > Hi, > > According to our first version will be enabled on FxOS with Certified apps > only, > to enable/support "app://" can allow us to add values into Certified apps by > this API. > > ex: An addon for desktop Firefox browser can launch an corresponding app in > remote TV. > Then you can fling what movie you are watching to TV and control it by > desktop Firefox browser. > > For packaged hosted app, I think it will be privileged app type at most. > So it will be relatively low priority indeed until this API is mature enough > to be exposed to privileged. > > Sincerely yours. > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fabrice Desré" <fabr...@mozilla.com> > To: dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:20:58 PM > Subject: Re: [PresentationAPI] Intend to implement > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:04:28 -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > >> On 2014-09-15, 5:47 AM, Kilik kuo wrote: >>> One more thing, >>> >>> We would like to support URL of app scheme for requesting session. >>> And the scope will be as below. >>> - Certified and Privileged with declaration of origin apps are >>> supported. >>> - Privileged apps w/o declaration of origin are NOT supported. >>> - Remote UA will launch the URL of app scheme only when this app is >>> already installed on device. Once URL of packaged hosted app is landed, >>> remote UA can launch installed app via the URL of http scheme. >>> (Maybe the 1st version of API will support app scheme for certified app >>> only) >> >> I'm not sure if I understand how a remote UA is supposed to render an >> app:// URL coming from a privileged app? > > The app needs to be installed on both UAs, but to ensure we have a common > origin on both sides, only apps that declare their origin will be > supported. I'd like us to get packaged hosted apps done instead of > needing to support this, so I think this should be relatively low > priority. > > Fabrice > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
