On 09/10/2014 05:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Yes!
> 
> Do we have a sense for how supportive other browser vendors are of
> these properties?

Supportive! I haven't tested other browsers' implementations yet, but I
do know that it's been implemented in Blink, and it was apparently
undergoing code-review in WebKit a year ago, so it's probably fixed
there too, by now.  More details here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0536.html

Note the "No info" on Microsoft there -- several months later in that
thread, a Microsoft representative said they "haven't committed to its
implementation"[1], but in a later message, they said "We don't have a
problem with the properties.  From our early evaluation, the approach
makes sense.  If the other implementers don't have objections to
un-prefixing these properties, neither do we."[2]

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0005.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0142.html

> And how stable we can expect these properties to be
> in the spec?

Pretty stable, I think. There's been no mention of the properties in
subject-lines on www-style since that ^ linked thread finished up in
October of last year (aside from one suggestion of an additional
object-fit value, which didn't get a response).  I take that as an
indication that things aren't really changing.

~Daniel
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to