On 2014-09-03, 11:47 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
On 9/3/14, 6:53 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
|mach build binaries| suffices most of the time
It really doesn't for the use case of not building the world when you change
a header and want to just rebuild the files that use the changed part of the
header...
I guess the "most of the time" wasn't enough of a qualifier. How about
"|mach build binaries| suffices most of the time, for me, on my
machine, for my work patterns"?
Sorry. This thread is making me grumpy. Lots of negativity. Not a lot
of constructive suggestions. Everyone is aware that the current
situation isn't perfect. I'm just trying to demonstrate that not
everything completely sucks for everyone all the time. I give kudos to
the build team for the progress that they are making.
I cannot understand where in this thread anyone has suggested that
everything completely sucks for everyone, and I believe I and others
have tried to provide constructive suggestions and use cases, although
nobody has come up with a suggestion that addresses all of the use
cases. I have definitely not meant any negativity towards anyone here,
and I'd really like to keep these conversations focused on technical stuff.
Cheers,
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
