This was posted to Governance and Yammer last week. If you haven't had a chance 
to provide feedback, there is still time. We are sending to this list because 
we would especially like to get technical input by Monday, July 28th. 
----------------------------------- 

Proposed Revision to Privacy Principles 

We’d like to propose changes to Mozilla’s Privacy Principles ( 
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/principles/ ) which were originally 
created in 2010. Mozilla’s principles stem from the Manifesto and inform how we 
build our products and services, manage data, work with partners, and shape our 
public policy and advocacy work. 

Why Update? 

The updates are a response to change within Mozilla and beyond. In four years, 
Mozilla has grown and expanded with new products and services that didn’t exist 
in 2010. In 2014, the world around is often described as “post-Snowden”, after 
his revelations sparked an international debate about Internet privacy and 
surveillance. 

The Process 

The initial draft was reviewed by a cross-section of Mozilla, including legal, 
engineering, metrics, security, foundation, content services, and engagement. 
After incorporating feedback, we’re bringing it to Governance (and Yammer) for 
broader review. 

The Changes 

We are providing the summary of proposed updates in two formats for you to 
review -- text and slides. 

A text format is at the bottom of this post. The text includes a side-by-side 
comparison to the original Privacy Principles with the context for the changes 
to the proposed Trust & Safety Principles. 

The second format is in the form of slides at this Google Doc link ( 
https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/presentation/d/1j6F3G4u8zTQflVupV8vFED21kCOsi_-oyi4WmqqNwxI/edit#slide=id.p
 ). The first slide includes Mozilla’s proposed Trust & Safety Principles along 
with a side-by-side comparison to the original Privacy Principles. The second 
slide summarizes the context for the changes, including the title change. 

Please note that these changes are not final and the wording may evolve based 
on feedback. 

Next Steps: 

Please read through the new Trust & Safety Principles and provide any feedback 
or questions you may have. This will be posted to Governance for 10 days -- we 
would love to have your input by Monday, 28 July 2014 . We plan to finalize the 
Trust & Safety Principles in August to update the Principles website 
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/principles/ ) and communicate the changes 
more broadly. 

TEXT FORMAT OF CHANGES: 

TITLE: 
Previous: Mozilla Privacy Principles 
New: Mozilla Trust & Safety Principles 
Context: Intended to be broader than privacy, yet inclusive of both privacy and 
security. The term Trust & Safety is used by Twitter, EBay, Airbnb and others. 

NO SURPRISES 
Previous: Only use and share information about our users for their benefit and 
as spelled out in our notices. 
New: Use information in a way that is transparent and benefits the user. 
Context: Removed the word “only” because there may be disagreement over whether 
“only” covers indirect benefits (ex: collecting data that helps improve your 
experience). Did not remove ‘user benefit’, although received some feedback 
that it doesn’t fit well with no surprises. Replaced “as spelled out in our 
notices” with transparent, because it is broader than just notices, and 
transparency may also be achieved through user experience. 

SENSIBLE SETTINGS 
Previous: Establish default settings that balance safety and user experience 
appropriately. 
New: Design for a thoughtful balance of safety and user experience. 
Context: Replaced “Establish default settings” with “Design for” to be less 
repetitive with the title and focus on the engineering design phase. Replaced 
“appropriately” with “thoughtful” to indicate carefully considered tradeoffs. 

REAL CHOICES (removed) 
Previous: Educate users whenever we collect any personal information and give 
them a choice whenever possible. 
Context: Eliminated based on feedback that the difference between choice and 
control wasn’t clear, and that the conversation has moved to control, rather 
than choice. 

LIMITED DATA 
Previous: Collect and retain the least amount of user information necessary. 
Try to share anonymous aggregate data whenever possible, and then only when it 
benefits the web, users or developers. 
New: Collect what we need, de-identify where we can and delete when no longer 
necessary. 
Context: Replaced “collect and retain the least amount” with the broader 
“collect what we need”. Removed “only when it benefits” seemed broad enough 
that most things would fall in one of the three. Considered adding “collect 
only” but concerns about differences in definition (ex: indirect benefit vs. 
direct benefit). Replaced “share anonymous aggregate data” with “de-identify” 
because it goes beyond sharing - also includes storing. Added data deletion as 
an important part of limited data. These three pieces, limited collection, 
de-identification, and deletion are areas where businesses will need to have 
strong processes in place to honor these. 

USER CONTROL 
Previous: Do not disclose personal user experience without the user’s consent. 
Innovate, develop and advocate for privacy enhancements that put users in 
control of their online experiences. 
New: Establish enhancements that allow individuals to control their data and 
online experiences 
Context: Removed the sentence about consent, because it is more of an example 
of enabling control. Removed “advocate for” to simplify and to focus on direct 
engineering action. Added ‘control their data’. 

TRUSTED THIRD PARTIES (relocated) 
Previous: Make privacy a factor in selecting and interacting with partners. 
Context: Incorporated into the introduction as “select and interact with 
partners”. All principles inform how we work with partners, so this does not 
need to be a standalone principle. 

IN-DEPTH DEFENSE (added) 
New: Innovate multi-layered security controls and practices, many of which are 
publicly verifiable by our global community. 
Context: Initially called “Multi-Layered Security”, but based on input from 
Security members, the new term -- “Defense In Depth” -- more accurately 
describes Mozilla’s security approaches and practices. Considered “open source 
community” but shortened to “global community”. 

Thanks, 

Stacy Martin and Alina Hua 
Data Privacy Team 


-- 
Stacy Martin 
Senior Manager, Privacy and Engagement 
Mozilla 
2 Harrison Street, Suite 700, San Francisco, CA 
916-390-4845 (cell) 
st...@mozilla.com 

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to