I have a plain old mechanical disk too, but I have 32 G of RAM, enough that
disk access is not relevant to my (unified) build times. After a build, I
have 12 to 14 G of RAM used for cache, so I suppose that disk performance
is still relevant if you have <= 16 G of RAM, yeah.

Benoit


2014-07-19 1:40 GMT-04:00 Geoff Lankow <ge...@darktrojan.net>:

> Ah yes, I forgot to say. I am on Linux. I've found using RAM instead of my
> (mechanical) disk saves about 5 minutes of a roughly half-hour build.
>
> GL
>
>
> On 19/07/14 16:24, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>
>> What OS are we talking about?
>>
>> (On Linux, ramdisks are mountpoints like any other so that would be
>> trivial; but then again, on Linux, the kernel is good enough at using
>> extra
>> RAM for disk cache automatically, that you get the benefits of a RAMdisk
>> automatically).
>>
>> Benoit
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-18 22:39 GMT-04:00 Geoff Lankow <ge...@darktrojan.net>:
>>
>>  Today I tried to build Firefox on a RAM disk for the first time, and
>>> although I succeeded through trial and error, it occurs to me that there
>>> are probably things I could do better. Could someone who regularly does
>>> this make a blog post or an MDN page about their workflow and some tips
>>> and
>>> tricks? I think it'd be useful to many people but I (read: Google)
>>> couldn't
>>> find anything helpful.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> GL
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev-platform mailing list
>>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>>>
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to