2014-06-04 20:28 GMT-04:00 Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au>: > On 05/06/14 07:20, Milan Sreckovic wrote: > >> In general, is “this is how it worked with SVGMatrix” one of the >> design principles? >> >> I was hoping this would be the time matrix rotate() method goes to >> radians, like the canvas rotate, and unlike SVGMatrix version that >> takes degrees... >> > > By the way, in the SVG Working Group we have been discussing (but haven't > decided yet) whether to perform a wholesale overhaul of the SVG DOM. > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/improving-svg-dom/ > > If we go through with that, then we could drop SVGMatrix and use DOMMatrix > (which wouldn't then need to be compatible with SVGMatrix) for all the SVG > DOM methods we wanted to retain that deal with matrices. I'm hoping we'll > resolve whether to go ahead with this at our next meeting, in August. >
Thanks, that's very interesting input in this thread, as the entire conversation here has been based on the axiom that we have to keep compatibility with SVGMatrix.... Benoit _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
