On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:35:49PM -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Rik Cabanier <caban...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't see why the web platform is special here and we should trust that > > authors can do the right thing. > > I'm fairly sure people have already pointed this out to you. But the > reason the web platform is different is that because we allow > arbitrary application logic to run on the user's device without any > user opt-in. > > I.e. the web is designed such that it is safe for a user to go to any > website without having to consider the risks of doing so. > > This is why we for example don't allow websites to have arbitrary > read/write access to the user's filesystem. Something that all the > other platforms that you have pointed out do. > > Those platforms instead rely on that users make a security decision > before allowing any code to run. This has both advantages (easier to > design APIs for those platforms) and disadvantages (malware is pretty > prevalent on for example Windows).
As much as I agree the API is not useful, I don't buy this argument either. What prevents a web app to just use n workers, where n is a much bigger number than what would be returned by the API? Mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform