Also note that even some popular desktop APIs that in practice expose the "hardware" thread count, choose not to call it that way. For example, Qt calls it the "ideal" thread count. http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qthread.html#idealThreadCount
IMO this suggests that we're not the only ones feeling uncomfortable about committing to "hardware thread count" as being forever a well-defined and useful thing to expose to applications. Benoit 2014-05-13 13:58 GMT-04:00 Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <pidgeo...@gmail.com>: > On 5/13/2014 12:35 PM, Eli Grey wrote: > >> Can you back that up with a real-world example desktop application >> that behaves as such? >> > > The OpenMP framework? > > > -- > Joshua Cranmer > Thunderbird and DXR developer > Source code archæologist > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
