I would make the mistake, so I'm all for it.

Cheers,
 David

On 12/05/14 22:07, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> So I'd like to propose that our C++ style require one-arg constructors
> to be marked explicit unless there's a clear comment explaining why the
> constructor is implicit.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Boris

-- 
David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD
 Performance Team, Mozilla

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to