I would make the mistake, so I'm all for it. Cheers, David
On 12/05/14 22:07, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > So I'd like to propose that our C++ style require one-arg constructors > to be marked explicit unless there's a clear comment explaining why the > constructor is implicit. > > Thoughts? > > -Boris -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform