On 12/05/2014 13:04 , Dirk Schulze wrote:
The CSS WG already decided to use asynchronous decision making as one possibility at TPAC 2013. I am in favor for this process but it was also decided that it is not the main possibility for decision making and won’t replace F2Fs (yet). So far, this possibility was used once or twice since then. It would be interesting if it needs to be part of the charter.
It doesn't need to be included in the charter, any group can run itself pretty much whichever way it wants to so long as it doesn't violate a few fundamentals. So technically the group can change whenever it wants to.
Putting it in the charter can be a nice way of documenting it (and helping with enforcement), but it isn't really binding.
-- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
