On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Eddy Bruel <ejpbr...@mozilla.com> wrote: > I would like to propose that we get rid of strict warnings as errors for > xpcshell tests. To quote Nick Fitzgerald: "The strict-warnings-as-an-error > feels like having some arbitrary linter forced upon our development that > isn't very useful.". Achieving strict warning free code is not a goal for > us, and I doubt it is for anyone else.
What does "get rid of strict warnings as errors for xpcshell tests" mean in practice? I don't understand how you're getting into the situation of "accidentally turn[ing] on strict warnings as errors". Gavin _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
