于 2014/4/15 星期二 4:06, Bobby Holley 写道:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, xunxun <xunxun1...@gmail.com
<mailto:xunxun1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to use a configurable way like
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Midas/Security_preferences,
which can solve some strange issues on a single js, NoScript is
too big for the problem.
For example, I use the policy by default on my custom build:
|pref("capability.policy.policynames", "pcxnojs");|
|pref("capability.policy.pcxnojs.sites", "http://nsclick.baidu.com";);|
|pref("capability.policy.pcxnojs.javascript.enabled", "noAccess");|
|nsclick.baidu.com <http://nsclick.baidu.com> |can cause firefox
tab closing costs too much time, so I use the policy to avoid it.
NoScript has the capability to do exactly that. You're also welcome
to write an extension that uses the same API, though you should know
that only one extension may use the API at a given time (so your users
would not be able to install NoScript).
See the API here:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/caps/idl/nsIScriptSecurityManager.idl#221
Thanks.
I haven't read how to write a firefox extension yet, and I also want to
find a method that do not depent on another extension.
If I revert the Bug913734 changes, will this cause another issues?
--
Best Regards,
xunxun
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
