On 2014-04-01, at 15:15, Rob Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > the similarity to a non-atomic integer type actually has prompted me to > have a (temporary) false sense of thread unsafety, rather than a false > sense of thread safety.
That was my impression too. I usually find that I have to chase after the definition to ensure that the variable is atomic, not the other way around. I’m used to Java’s primitives, which are explicit. Just don’t do both. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
