Yeah. In general there are still some pain points using lldb, since a lot of automation still assumes gdb (I'm looking at you, jit-tests). We're going to have to use lldb going forward, so I think we should make it a priority to improve the developer experience when using it.
bholley On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Till Schneidereit < t...@tillschneidereit.net> wrote: > This is fantastic, thank you so much! > > a few months ago, I started looking into porting the pretty printers and > niceties for various SpiderMonkey things that live in js/src/gdb, but the > way much of this works is very different from gdb, so I didn't get too far > back them. This makes me want to pick that project up again. > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > For those of you who are using LLDB -- either by choice, or against your > > will after upgrading to OS X 10.9 -- I've added some Gecko-specific LLDB > > functionality to an .lldbinit file in the tree. I've mainly started with > > porting across the commands from the in-tree .gdbinit that were still > > useful. > > > > You can read about it here: > > > > http://mcc.id.au/blog/2014/01/lldb-gecko > > > > Let me know if you have any ideas for further commands and type summaries > > we could add! > > > > Cameron > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
