On 1/7/2014 1:16 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
Hungarian notation = unnecessary and costly (technology fixed this problem 
years ago, for member vs. local most editors can do syntax highlighting; plus, 
it’s easier to type and read without it).
Especially for new contributors we shouldn't assume that most editors can do this correctly. I personally think that the risk of introducing a new member and then having locals shadow members is real enough that we should somehow distinguish them. I don't have strong opinions about our current mFoo naming versus the google-like member_ naming.


Braces always = net win.  Consistency + bug resilience > any aesthetic 
preference (which is trained anyway).
It's not really a question of aesthetic preference. It's a question of reducing the vertical size of a method so that more of it fits on screen, especially when dealing with small error-handling paths. But we've had this conversation twice before, and Brendan decided that the always-braced style was the one we were going to use. So, despite it being not my personal preference, it's already settled and not worth reopening ;-)

Here’s a few other things that I think should be added:

function and file length limits:

I think that 32 lines is enough for JS, and maybe 50 for C/C++ due to the 
increased need for error checking stuff.
1000 lines is enough for any single class/file.

I’m certain others will want much longer :)  Why so short?  Function names are 
great just-in-time help, and long functions suffer from tl;cr (too long; can’t 
read).

cyclomatic complexity limits:

I like 8 for JS and probably 15 for C/C++ due to the impact of error checking.  
Again, I’m sure others will want more.
The style guide is *mostly* a place to describe existing practice and formatting conventions. Your proposal here isn't in scope for the current discussion, nor something that at all describes current practice.

--BDS

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to