On 11/5/13, 2:00 AM, Neil wrote:
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
I don't have all my patches applied all the time. If I work on
something, leave it for 2 weeks, and qpush it again, I usually get to
do the "fix all the .rej" dance.
That's an interesting use case. If changeset evolution replaces mq you
could just leave the commit in your local tree, then rebase it when
you're ready to work on it again. (My hg-fu isn't up to how you would
track these commits; bookmarks maybe?)
I recommend people use bookmarks (or even heavyweight Mercurial
branches) instead of mq. You can use rebase and histedit to rewrite
history. I have a blog post queued up emphasizing why this is better.
Hopefully in the next week or two.
Changeset evolution isn't ready for prime time. While I switched to it,
I've encountered a few annoying bugs that would confuse newbies. I only
recommend experienced Mercurial users use it at this time. Once it lands
in a stable Mercurial release, I'm going to highly recommend people
abandon mq.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
