On 10/16/2013 9:39 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 15/10/13 17:06, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:

You have given on-disk footprint values, but surely download size values
are the important ones for the issue you are raising? After all, some of
this data may be very compressible, and some may not.
Correct. The download weight costs are listed in the bug, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=853301#c2

MacOS X, 32+64 bit (dmg):        60.7 MB   54.7 MB   5.9 MB   10.8 %
Windows, 32 bit (installer.exe): 22.4 MB   20.5 MB   1.9 MB    9.2 %

I don't know whether there is a way to more optimally compress these in the installer.

--BDS


_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to