On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jeff Gilbert <jgilb...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Bas is also correct about lowering latency by waiting until closer to
> vblank, and continuing to update the data the compositor renders from,
> instead of just trying to finish a frame as soon as possible. The proposal
> reads to me to indicate that low-latency stuff should be handled earlier,
> but this is only true if you would otherwise miss the vblank window. What
> Bas described is exactly what we want, to my knowledge.
>

Are you talking about firing requestAnimationFrame for low-latency windows
say halfway through the vblank interval so that input events in the first
half of the interval can be taken into account by a frame composited just
before the end of the interval?

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to