Hi Gregory et al.,

On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Mike Hommey wrote:

> CCing the last two persons who submitted patches for OS/2
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:13:23PM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> > We have a number of references to OS/2 throughout the build system
> > and source tree. According to Kyle Huey OS/2 has likely broken since
> > we removed --disable-ipc (bug 638755) in March 2011.
> >
> > While OS/2 is a tier-3 supported build configuration [1], we will
> > shortly be rewriting a bunch of the build rules to handle
> > non-recursive compilation. Since OS/2 is effectively dead as an
> > operating system and since it apparently hasn't been able to build
> > mozilla-central since 2011 without many people complaining AFAIK,
> > I'm proposing that we remove traces of OS/2 from the build system.
> > This likely plays out as not carrying OS/2 support forward as we
> > change things. If the OS/2 community wishes to submit patches to
> > re-add support, we can accept them, just like any tier-3 platform.
> >
> > Just to be clear, I don't believe other tier-3 operating systems may
> > fall victim during refactors. OS/2 is special in that the OS is
> > officially dead and sufficiently different from other supported
> > platforms. It therefore is a non-trivial burden for us to attempt
> > support as we perform large refactors to the build system.
> >
> > Are there any objections to this proposal?

There is an ongoing port (currently of the 17 ESR branch of Firefox)
here:
   https://github.com/bitwiseworks/mozilla-os2
>From the discussion in the mozilla.dev.ports.os2 newsgroup (that I just
glanced at) I take it that they had some success but they are not
planning to push the changes back to upstream, so I guess it doesn't
influence them much, if you rip out OS/2 support from the main tree. In
fact, one of the first items on their list was to rewrite the build
system to kBuild, so removing OS/2 from the Mozilla build system should
be fine.

So I agree with your proposal, but as I have no relations to the team
doing that, I could be wrong.
   Peter.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to