On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Andrea Marchesini <amarches...@mozilla.com>wrote:
> Hi all, > > this is my first email here. wow. > I'm writing this email because I spent several months converting IDL > components to WebIDL. > It's hard to find how many components have been converted, what is still > missing, etc, etc. > > So I wrote this: > https://people.mozilla.com/~amarchesini/code/idl2webidl.rb > > This ruby script generates an HTML page: > > https://people.mozilla.com/~amarchesini/code/idl2webidl.html > > (this page is not up-to-date) > > I know that we don't want to convert all the existing interfaces to > WebIDL, but I still think this report is useful to choose which interface > is available to be converted. > > Bye, > b > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > FWIW, the only things we have to convert are DOM interfaces. The rest are things we can do if desired, but we should default to not converting internal XPCOM interfaces due to the additional codesize that WebIDL bindings add. - Kyle _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
