On 2013-07-19 3:26 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-07-18 10:46 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:54:02PM -0500, Joshua Cranmer ? wrote:
On 7/18/2013 7:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
<ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>wrote:

On 2013-07-18 5:48 AM, mscl...@googlemail.com wrote:

          r-value references      4.3@    10.0!   Yes
This is very useful.  I believe the JS engine already rolls their
own tricks to implement this semantics.

With this we can get rid of already_AddRefed and just pass
nsRefPtr/nsCOMPtr/RefPtr around, right?
I believe so. We can also add a non-broken variant of nsAutoPtr
modeled after std::unique_ptr (allows moves but not copies).

Note that STL is another story. We're not using libstdc++ that comes
with the compiler on android and b2g. We use STLport instead, and STLport
has, afaik, no support for C++11 STL types. So, while we can now fix
nsAutoPtr to use move semantics instead of copy semantics, we can't use
std::unique_ptr.

Does this mean that we can't use std::move and std::forward either?  In
that case, we need MFBT versions of those, because working with rvalue
references without those two functions is a pain!

Good news is that implementing these functions should be really easy.

Also, is there a reason that we don't build on Android with the libstdc++ that ships with the toolchain?

Ehsan

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to