On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Karl Tomlinson <mozn...@karlt.net> wrote:
> Robert O'Callahan writes: > > > How about this idea: after processing a WM_MOUSEMOVE event, go into an > > "anti-flood" state where WM_MOUSEMOVE is ignored. After we service the > > Gecko event queue, exit the anti-flood state. > > The general approach sounds good. > > I expect "ignored" will have to be "ignored at least until there > is another user input event" so that the document will know where > the mouse is when a key is pressed. > Why? We currently don't do anything to ensure mousemoves are flushed before key events. Rob -- Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28] _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
