>> If your patch falls in a range which >> causes more than 4% Ts regression, it will be backed out by our sheriffs >> together with the rest of the patches in that range, and you can only >> reland after you fix the regression by testing locally or on the try >> server.
Our tools for comparing talos results are in a pitiful state. I know that improving them is part of the SfN effort, but I want to emphasize that if we're backing out patches for Ts regressions now, we need these tools yesterday. -Justin On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Dao <d...@design-noir.de> wrote: > On 18.10.2012 20:05, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: >> >> If your patch falls in a range which >> causes more than 4% Ts regression, it will be backed out by our sheriffs >> together with the rest of the patches in that range, and you can only >> reland after you fix the regression by testing locally or on the try >> server. > > > The last point seems excessive. If multiple patches are in the range and you > think yours is likely innocent, I think you should be allowed to re-land. > Worst case is you'll get backed out a second time, but this seems like it's > going to have less time overhead than manually messing with talos. > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
