Thanks but I won't switch until the MediaRecorder is fully implemented
on all major browsers. Cannot risk breakage for a heavily used
webservice.
I ll observe this closely and see how it goes ...
- Michael
---
Binary Kitchen
Michael Heuberger
1/33 Parrish Road
Sandringham
Auckland 1025
(New Zealand)
Mobile (text only) ... +64 21 261 89 81
Email ................ [email protected]
Website .............. http://www.binarykitchen.com
On 2015-10-20 04:00, Maire Reavy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM,
<[email protected]>
wrote:
I do not recommend MediaRecorder, since it is not implemented in all
Browsers. Using websockets to send frames to the server already works
very
well for my prototype www.videomail.io - check it out, it is open
source
and available on npm:
https://github.com/binarykitchen/videomail-client
That certainly is a viable alternative. I will say that MediaRecorder
is
coming to browsers very soon. Firefox has it. Chrome has video
support
for MediaRecorder, and they are actively working on audio. It is the
most
starred bug in all of Chrome (not just all of WebRTC -- all of Chrome).
It
is the hot new feature, and you could get ahead of the curve by
starting to
use it now. And I certainly would appreciate getting more devs using
it in
Firefox.
-Maire
_______________________________________________
dev-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
