On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:10:27 -0500 Neil Watson <[email protected]> wrote:
NW> I do not want to see yet another CM syntax and product unless that NW> syntax is designed and offered as an open standard, not ruled or NW> controlled by any for-profit corp, that any CM product can use. The NW> selfish silos of open source CM have hurt us all. NW> Many orgs are not happy with their first choice of CM tool, but the cost NW> of rewriting all their policy to a new one keeps them where they are. I agree with both Mike and Neil. But Neil's point applies to our entire industry. An open standard for CM tools will grow the market by creating an open community that can share expertise, modules, and tools. The history of many other industries shows this. Ted -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "dev-cfengine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dev-cfengine/87y402uyej.fsf%40lifelogs.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
