** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830404
Title:
Proposed removal of GNOME Classic desktop would be a serious usability
and accessibility regression
Status in “gnome-session” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Bug description:
In
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/739812/comments/5
, Mark Shuttleworth said,
"... we have the Classic desktop fallback in Natty, but will not in
Oneiric."
This is worrying. Any attempt to remove support for the Classic
desktop is likely to cause serious problems for many Ubuntu users,
either because Unity doesn't work on their hardware for some reason,
or because they just don't like it -- and it's abundantly clear that
many people don't like it.
For the purpose of this bug, it doesn't really matter why people don't
like Unity or why it breaks for them. (In my case, it's because I have
a 4480x1440 total display area, for which many of the tablet-oriented
design decisions in Unity make absolutely no sense.)
It could be argued that that anyone who doesn't want Unity can stay
with Maverick or Natty. However, since those aren't LTS releases, they
are only supported until April 2012 and October 2012 respectively
(including for security fixes). So that's not really an acceptable
alternative to continuing to provide the Classic desktop until at
least the next LTS release. In my case, I switched from Windows having
no idea that Ubuntu would make such drastic changes to the interface
in the very next release. (If I'd known that, I might have installed
Lucid instead. But downgrading from Maverick to Lucid to get the LTS
support doesn't make sense; that would just cause stuff to break.)
It is possible to switch to KDE or some other alternative to Unity, of
course (although making that switch from a GNOME/Metacity-based
install is not without problems). Other environment/window manager
combinations are usually selected using the same login screen menu
that is used to select Classic vs Unity. Assuming that menu is still
there in Oneiric (it will be, right?), and assuming that all the
classic desktop packages are still available in the Oneiric apt
repositories (they will be, right?), I wonder what simplification is
really available from removing Classic as one of the
environment/window manager options. If no simplification is available,
then there is no justification for removing the option.
So, we need some clarity:
* what does "we will not [have the Classic desktop fallback] in Oneiric"
mean precisely? Does it just mean not installing packages needed for the
Classic desktop *by default* on new installs (but keeping them in the
repositories and in a working state, and not messing about with them on
existing installs), or does it mean more than that?
* will anything that might be necessary for a particular setup currently
using the Classic desktop to work, be uninstalled or disabled on an upgrade to
Oneiric? (such as disabling the proprietary NVidia drivers as in bug 772019,
for example)
* if a user has explicitly changed the default environment back to Classic
desktop in Natty, will installing Oneiric override that preference, and if so
will changing it back again cause regressions like there were with the
Maverick->Natty upgrade? (bug 734373 and bug 735861, for example)
* for those users who do use Unity, will critical usability and
accessibility regressions such as bug 654988, bug 739812, and (not specific to
Unity) bug 762806, block the Oneiric release?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/830404/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
