Applications that depend on the alternatives x-www-browser and gnome-
www-browser are fundamentally broken. You should report bugs against
applications that are using those instead, then we could get rid of them
entirely
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943153
Title:
x-www-browser not the same as gnome-www-browser
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Bug description:
I just discovered that x-www-browser is different to gnome-www-browser.
This can cause some weird behaviour.
Use case:
Install firefox and opera on your system. Opera sets itself as default
x-www-browser wheras firefox sets itself as default gnome-www-browser.
Now, some apps use gnome-www-browser, while others rely on x-www-browser.
For example: clicking a link in thunderbird opens firefox, while dropbox
opens opera.
For the not-so-power users, there is no graphical way to set x-www-browser.
(At least, i havent found one)
So the question is: Is it really necessary to have these two seperate
confi-options still in 2012?
Wouldnt it make sense to have these two config-options linked to one another?
Or are there still so many use cases that justify a distiction between
gnome-www-browser and x-www-browser?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/943153/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
