Re-opening a bug that's of the same nature, how exactly is that unacceptable? The version numbers may be different but it very much is relevant to the topic. It's a regression, from what I read of the situation, which warrants re-opening. Age is not relevant IMO. I do agree with the premise of keeping tidy/clean bug reports and the sort, but that can also include re-opening items due to regression too :^).
Besides, opening a new issue would make it a duplicate from what I can tell ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412195 Title: ttf-tahoma-replacement makes some web-sites look ugly Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in wine1.2 package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: wine1.2 This font package is good for wine 1.2; however, it also makes sites look ugly in Firefox and other browsers. I had to manually remove the fonts from /usr/share/fonts/ to rectfiy this, because removing the package through apt would have made me remove wine 1.2 and I didn't want that. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Aug 12 00:23:40 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: ttf-tahoma-replacement 1.1.27-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-5.24-generic SourcePackage: wine1.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-5-generic i686 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/412195/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
