For the next SRUs, if you have to add a patch or make other changes to
something under debian/, please document it so that the SRU review can
be quicker. In this particular case here, there is a patch being added
that has no DEP3 header, no upstream bug, no origin, etc, which makes
the review take more time.

For the record, Rico pasted this information to me on irc, about this
patch:

<ricotz> ahasenack, the commit itself points to the troublesome bug
report and the mailing list discussion of this aarch64 regression, as
seen at
https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/log/?h=wip/lunar-7.5

Related:
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/e2397a57ca66a06950a669a3971fbc55b8f5f979%5E%21


** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Lunar)
       Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-lunar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037274

Title:
  [SRU] libreoffice 7.5.7 for lunar

Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * LibreOffice 7.5.7 is in its seventh bugfix release of the 7.5 line:
       https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.5#7.5.7_release

   * Version 7.5.6 is currently released in lunar. For a list of fixed bugs 
compared to 7.5.6 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.5.7 
(that's a total of 14 bugs):
       https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.5.7/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs

       7.5.7 RC1 is identical to the 7.5.7 release

   * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and
  the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU
  a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes.

  [Testing]

   * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include
  unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised
  (both in an automated manner and manually).

    * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here:
      https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_75/1697/

    * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here:
      * Automated tests
        https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests
      * Automated UI tests
        https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests
      * Regression tests
        https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests
      * Feature tests
        https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests

   * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were 
run and verified as passing.
      Tested build can be found at 
https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15171690/+listing-archive-extra
      * [amd64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20230925_122613_dc43d@/log.gz
      * [arm64] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20230925_154920_2e924@/log.gz
      * [armhf] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20230926_164913_a0855@/log.gz
      * [ppc64el] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20230925_123824_567d4@/log.gz
      * [riscv64] not available
      * [s390x] 
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20230925_131148_33d08@/log.gz
   * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were 
carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice

  [Regression Potential]

   * A minor release with a total of 14 bug fixes always carries the
  potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only
  release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing
  features were removed.

   * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as
  described above should provide reasonable confidence that no
  regressions sneaked in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2037274/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to