> On test plans, I see both this bug and the other one will be individually 
> tested, but
> what's the plan to ensure that other behaviour in mutter isn't regressed?
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Mutter exists, so would 
> following that be
> appropriate, or do you want to do something else to verify this?

I don't have a good answer to that, sorry. Mutter and GNOME Shell are
very large projects and the desktop team only has between 1 and 3 people
working on them at any given time. So we rely on community testing of
proposed and careful monitoring of bug reports.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023766

Title:
  Mouse cursor stutters over GUI elements that are animated

Status in mutter package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in mutter source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed
Status in mutter source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  Mouse cursor stutters over GUI elements that are animated, such as GTK
  apps, web pages and shell elements.

  [ Test Plan ]

  1. Open Settings.
  2. Move the cursor up/down over an empty area of the desktop.
  3. Move the cursor up/down over the list pane on the left side of the 
Settings window.

  Expect: No difference in cursor smoothness whether the window below is
  animating in response to movement or not.

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  In frame scheduling, so the risk is more stuttering or screen freezes.

  [ Workaround ]

  Add this to /etc/environment:
  CLUTTER_PAINT=disable-dynamic-max-render-time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2023766/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to