Hello Didier, or anyone else affected, Accepted adsys into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.9.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: adsys (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973752 Title: Fix privilege permission which can not be set to disabled Status in adsys package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in adsys source package in Focal: Fix Committed Status in adsys source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] Disallowing local administrator does not work as excepted: - on some AD server, setting in the UI this key (and some other similars) to disabled, go to next GPO rule, then back to this one, AD will display the key as enabled. - on the client machine, we can see that the key has no state and nothing is forcibly allowed or disallowed. [Test case] * Install the new admx/adml with this version on the AD server. * On AD, go to disallow local administator, set it to disabled * Go to next GPO rules and then go back * The rule should still be disabled. * On an Ubuntu machine connected with AD by adsys, with ua attached, force a machine refresh with adsysctl policy update -m. * Check in adsysctl policy applied --all that the key is displayed as disabled * Confirm that no local administrator (part of the sudo group) can run "sudo". [Where problems could occur] The privilege manager and other policies impacts both Windows and client: - on Windows, this is in the admx/adml are statically generated and then shipped as thus. There is no runtime exercising this. The consequence of those generated files to be invalid is that Windows AD server will not show up "Ubuntu" in its GPO template. - on the client, the privilege manager is the main consumer of those disabled key types. The other kinds of keys are not impacted. [Additional informations] * New test cases have been added for the client part. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/1973752/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
