Yes, please test in the 3-5 ppa -- it makes it easier to argue this is a needed SRU when some people report it is used for some time without any observed regressions. Thanks.
** Summary changed: - [SRU] LibreOffice 3.5.6 for precise + [SRU] LibreOffice 3.5.7 for precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037111 Title: [SRU] LibreOffice 3.5.7 for precise Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: [IMPACT] * https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-3-5/+sourcepub/2604568 /+listing-archive-extra and https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/2567714 /+listing-archive-extra for fixed bugs * see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical- board/2012-June/001283.html ff. [TESTCASE] * see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical- board/2012-June/001283.html ff. * in testing by the popular ppas: https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa/ and https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-3-5 since 2012-08-11 [Regression Potential] * see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical- board/2012-June/001283.html ff. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1037111/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
