upstream closed the bug with that comment "I think this is pretty
straightforward. OS X uses the same phrase."

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388656

Title:
  Non-intuitive term "Move to trash"

Status in One Hundred Paper Cuts:
  Confirmed
Status in Nautilus:
  Invalid
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: nautilus

  When browsing through file context menu, I've noticed that I couldn't
  find a command to delete it. Only after examining each item, I found
  "Move to trash".

  IMHO it's unintuitive. An user doesn't want to move a file/folder, but
  to remove it (the fact that there's an undo - a trash, shouldn't
  change the terminology). The term "move" misses what user wants to do.

  Simple "Delete" would be *much easier to spot*, especially when the
  menu has many items (16 in my case). It would be simpler and it would
  be shorter.

  When user enables permanent deleting in preferences, the term could be
  "Delete permanently".

  
  The issue was already raised many times before in some places
  (e.g. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03430.html - see 4. 
"Move to Trash"
  or http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1007979 - task "Search sample 
document from a specific option, delete and then restore it.") but no action 
was taken.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/388656/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to