Hi Cor, Am 03.02.2016 um 12:21 schrieb Cor Nouws: > Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote on 02-02-16 19:29: > >> A question that came to my mind: Should we place the "print empty pages" >> setting more prominently on the general page near the range selection >> like the reverse order checkbox, as it directly affects the print range >> selection? > > Yes, would be a good improvement IMO.
Guess I should talk about it in the design meeting on Friday. > FYI: there was an extensive discussion reg. printing/the dialog. > Mainly focussed on the trouble to override document settings > and print on a paper size specified by a printer. > > few mails from that: > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/msg07254.html > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/msg07327.html > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/msg07326.html That's also one of our bugs, but I didn't follow that discussion closely. Did I mention I want most stuff in LO 5.0, our next LO release ;-) ATB Jan-Marek P.S. Printing is generally problematic on Linux. Don't know how many bugs we fixed, also in KDE / Qt and Gtk+, and a colleague developed https://bitbucket.org/haftmann/macchiato P.S.S. And then there is Qt5, with statement like Qt5 having minimal printing support and "Anyone interested in funding development should contact...", https://wiki.qt.io/Qt-5-QtPrint - We have two more years until our first K*5 roll-out, so (enough?) time to fix stuff (or to switch DE?) -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
