Hi Stuart, all Le 16 déc. 2014 21:10, "V Stuart Foote" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > @Sophi, *, > > Kendy may have a different take, but Design/UX elected to not try to do this > on Redmine.
Ok, no problem, as said I'm not aware of your workflow. > > The rub comes in that when posted to Bugzilla, the actions are opened > Unconfirmed. But they are not issues requiring QA, although anyone should > fell welcome to comment and get involved from a UX perspective. Yes, I understand > > Guess issue can simply be set new on opening, and always assign to ux-advise > component. Work flow would be to keep these issues open (or maybe > needinfo) in ux-advise until Design/UX-advise folks agree to move it forward > for development, or close it out. Ok, this is something I'll propose on the QA meeting tomorrow > > Having the proposal in bugzilla greatly simplifies review and discussion > during Design Hangouts. But understand the QA thrash having the additional > bugs cluttering the stats--simple compromise as above. Ok, thanks for your further explanation. The things is that most of the times QA team has no clue if it's a valid enhancement or not (because of missing info in the bug, knowledge, etc). So either they could close a valid request or accept one which is not possible to implement. See the example with conditional formating and contextual menu where it now applies to a range and not a cell. For both, the submitters and the reviewers, this is not a good workflow. But what you proposed is a great compromise. Thanks Stuart for all what you do in our project and the way you do it :-) Cheers Sophie -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
