On 6/14/13 10:56 PM, venu wrote:
Hi Rick, Thanks for working on these issues.. So, are you using the same id(DERBY-6263) for tracking this issue also?
Hi Venu,
I have broadened the scope of DERBY-6263. I have re-phrased it as a bigger discrepancy between the node inspection done by the debug printer and the node inspection done by the compiler's node visitors. I suspect that a fair amount of work may be needed to align the two inspectors. I have attached a patch to DERBY-6263 to handle the uninspected clauses in SelectNodes. If the tests pass cleanly, I'll port this fix to the 10.10 branch too.
Currently, there is no requirement that the two inspectors align. However, I think that the discrepancies indicate a potential problem that deserves some thought. That said, aligning the inspectors may take some time. We may be able to point you to a workaround with fewer problems if you can give us more context about why you are using the TreeWalker.
Thanks, -Rick
If not could you please let me know the id for this issue? Thanks, Venu -- View this message in context: http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/Using-ASTParser-and-TreeWalker-for-parsing-SQL-query-tp131219p131432.html Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
