I noticed there is anther annotation @Folder, why the @View does not reuse the concept in Seam3 faces.
@ViewPattern @UrlMapping @FacesRedirect it is more direct. Hantsy On 3/28/2013 18:03, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > a simple example is also @View(navigation = REDIRECT). you just need in one > place if you inherit it. > you will appreciate some advantages >esp.< in large applications or during > the maintenance phase. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/3/28 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> Harald, >> >> it gets more obvious if you add @Secured and page beans to the mix. >> >> You can centrally define the security rules for your pages (and folders) >> and apply other cross cutting concerns very easily. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Harald Wellmann <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:45 AM >>> Subject: Re: Goals for JSF examples? >>> >>> Yes, I've seen these slides before. But I don't see what problem >>> you're trying to solve. There are lots of annotations with unclear >>> purpose. To me, this looks like a simple thing (i.e. navigation by >>> view name, without faces-config.xml navigation rules) made complex for >>> no obvious benefit. >>> >>> What does it help to have a class Pages.Index corresponding to >>> /pages/index.xhtml? If I rename index.xhtml to welcome.xhtml, I >>> probably have to rename Pages.Index to Pages.Welcome, there is no IDE >>> refactoring doing that for me. So what's the point....? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Harald >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/27 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: >>>> hi harald, >>>> >>>> for now you could have a look e.g. at [1] (esp. slide #4). >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> gerhard >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> >> http://os890.blogspot.co.at/2012/02/slides-make-jsf-more-type-safe-with-cdi.html
