Hi everybody,
I started a discussion at https://community.jboss.org/message/764873#764873 about the seam transaction interceptor, which is not handling derived methods (see original post further down). Jason Porter pointed me to this mail list, stating that DeltaSpikes Transactional Interceptor behaves in the same way. What are the reasons for this? Isn't it normally the case that a user wants transactional behavior regardless of where the method is defined (base class or derived class)? Additionally I regard it dangerous if an interceptor does not behave like an ordinal interceptor (I know: Transactional intercepts every call, but it does different things depending on the class defining the method intercepted). Please give me some hint, why the implementation of Transactional was done in that way. Thank you very much and best regards Dirk Weil
