+1 since it doesn't prevent to get a nicer config for 0.5 *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/5/22 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > Yea, thought about that as well. We can target this with 0.5. > Still there is an open issue for the globalAlternatives since months. > And I like to fix this before the release. > > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > >Sent: Wednesday, 22 May 2013, 15:55 > >Subject: Re: globalAlternatives > > > > > > > >Hi Mark, > > > > > >throw the question of the configuration for me. I think we should use a > hierarchic config (can be prefixes in properties format but in > groovy/yml/xml/... it would just be a block). > > > > > >Romain Manni-Bucau > >Twitter: @rmannibucau > >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > > >2013/5/22 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > >Hi! > >> > >>Currently the globalAlternatives approach is configured by > >> > >>interface=impl > >> > >>in some properties. The issue is that this is pretty costly to detect as > there is no common prefix. > >> > >>I suggest we add a hardcoded "globalAlternatives." in front of the > interface. > >> > >>That way we can improve the handling speed pretty easily. > >> > >>wdyt? > >> > >>LieGrue, > >>strub > >> > > > > > > >
